Prince Warrior Response is a 1.30mm co-polyester string built around an unusual layered construction. A softer polymer core is enclosed by a firmer co-extruded polyester exterior, giving the string a hybrid-like internal design rather than the uniform structure of a conventional monofilament.
Prince positions the concept between firm polyester control and more forgiving synthetic playability. Reliable independent evaluations describe above-average power, comfort and touch for a polyester-based string while retaining a controlled response.
Warrior Response is best suited to intermediate and advanced players who want a less severe entry into polyester performance. Players comparing it with nylon or multifilament options can use the Tennis String Finder before choosing a setup.
Prince Warrior Response Rating
| Category | Rating |
|---|---|
| Power | 7.5/10 |
| Spin | 7.5/10 |
| Comfort | 8.5/10 |
| Control | 8.5/10 |
These ratings place Warrior Response within the broader string market while recognizing that its main advantage is balanced, user-friendly polyester performance rather than maximum spin or free power.
Prince Warrior Response Specifications
| Specification | Details |
|---|---|
| String type | Internally layered co-polyester |
| Construction | Soft polymer core enclosed by co-extruded polyester |
| Common gauge | 16 / 1.30mm |
| Profile | Not consistently documented; not primarily marketed through shaped edges |
| Surface | No separate named coating consistently documented |
| Color | Silver |
| Set length | Approximately 12.2m |
Current product information consistently supports the 1.30mm gauge, silver color and layered construction. Shape descriptions conflict across secondary listings, so the string should not be presented as a confirmed triangular or shaped model without packaging evidence.
Material and Construction
Warrior Response uses co-extrusion to place two different response zones inside one string. A softer polymer forms the center, while a firmer polyester-based exterior surrounds it.
This does not make the string a conventional racket hybrid. A normal hybrid uses one string in the mains and another in the crosses. Warrior Response incorporates contrasting materials within every length of the same string.
The firm outer layer provides control, surface resistance and the direct feedback associated with polyester. The softer core is intended to add pocketing and reduce the severe response that can occur with a uniform, stiff monofilament.
Prince does not consistently publish a named coating for Warrior Response. Performance claims should therefore focus on the layered core and co-extruded exterior rather than inventing a low-friction treatment or proprietary surface technology.
The profile is also inconsistently described by retailers. Because established product overviews emphasize the internal construction rather than geometric bite, Warrior Response is better understood as a comfortable control string than as a dedicated shaped-spin string.
Prince Warrior Response Performance
Power
Warrior Response is livelier than many traditional control polyesters. The softer inner material allows more deformation at impact, helping intermediate players find depth without the exceptionally dead response of a firm monofilament.
Power remains controlled rather than effortless. The polyester exterior restrains launch, and the thick 1.30mm gauge favors stability over maximum elasticity.
Players with long swings can use the string’s moderate rebound while accelerating confidently. Those with compact swings may still find a multifilament or synthetic gut easier to activate.
Its power rating should be interpreted relative to polyester. Natural gut and premium multifilaments remain substantially more elastic across the wider string market.
Power rating: 7.5/10
Spin
Warrior Response offers good spin when paired with developed racket-head speed. Its controlled response lets players swing upward without an excessively lively launch.
The 1.30mm diameter supplies stability and resistance but is not the most responsive gauge for maximum string movement. Reliable product descriptions do not consistently establish sharp edges as the source of spin.
Players should therefore expect technique-driven spin and useful snapback rather than the aggressive geometric bite of a thin, sharply shaped polyester.
In a hybrid, a smooth and reasonably durable cross can help preserve main-string movement. The exact result depends on the chosen partner and whether Warrior Response is installed in the mains or crosses.
Spin rating: 7.5/10
Control
Control is one of Warrior Response’s strongest qualities. The firm polyester exterior helps contain rebound and supports a predictable launch on full swings.
The softer core adds pocketing without turning the string into a trampoline. Independent evaluation describes controllable power and a comfortably firm response rather than uncontrolled liveliness.
The 1.30mm gauge also contributes a stable feel, particularly in open patterns or larger racket heads. Flatter hitters may appreciate this trajectory consistency even if they do not maximize spin.
Control can decline after tension loss and reduced elasticity alter the stringbed. A physically intact co-polyester should not be assumed to retain its original precision indefinitely.
Control rating: 8.5/10
Comfort and Feel
Comfort is the feature that separates Warrior Response from many conventional co-polyesters. The softer internal core is intended to reduce impact severity and add pocketing beneath the firm exterior.
Independent playtesting has described above-average comfort and touch for a polyester-based string. That makes Warrior Response relevant to players who find traditional control strings too rigid but still want polyester characteristics.
The response remains firmer than natural gut or a soft multifilament. The 1.30mm gauge and polyester exterior prevent it from behaving like an elastic nylon string.
No polyester should be called universally arm-safe. Players with recurring elbow, wrist or shoulder discomfort should consider a polyester-free setup and seek qualified medical advice where appropriate.
Comfort rating: 8.5/10
Durability and Tension Maintenance
Warrior Response has solid physical resistance in principle because of its polyester exterior and 1.30mm diameter. However, user reports include both satisfactory longevity and unexpectedly early breakage, so durability should not be guaranteed.
Physical resistance to snapping is different from useful playability duration. Like other co-polyesters, Warrior Response can lose tension and elasticity before it breaks.
The softer construction may make the string more playable than a firm polyester, but it does not establish exceptional tension maintenance. No reliable manufacturer claim supports describing it as one of the longest-lasting co-polyesters.
In a full bed, replace it when launch rises, control becomes inconsistent, snapback declines or impact feels unusually dead. In a hybrid, also inspect notching where the two materials intersect.
Players should track hours and response rather than waiting indefinitely for breakage. The useful endpoint will depend on swing speed, pattern, racket stiffness and installation tension.
Choosing the Right Gauge
Warrior Response is most consistently available in one gauge.
| Gauge option | Availability | General characteristics |
|---|---|---|
| 16 / 1.30mm | Established set specification | Stable response, added material and moderate string movement |
| Thinner alternative | Not consistently documented for this model | Do not assume a 1.25mm version without checking current packaging |
Players who want a thinner, faster-moving string should compare another model rather than ordering an unverified Warrior Response gauge.
Full Bed or Hybrid Setup
Full Bed
A full bed gives the clearest expression of Warrior Response’s internal layered design. It provides controlled power, a comfortably firm feel and consistent material across the entire racket.
This setup best suits intermediate and advanced players who already use polyester responsibly. It remains firmer and less elastic than nylon alternatives.
Warrior Response in the Mains With Softer Crosses
Warrior Response mains emphasize control, physical resistance and polyester-led response. A multifilament or synthetic gut cross can add power and comfort.
This direction suits players who want a softer hybrid without giving up polyester mains. The softer crosses may fray or break first under main-string movement.
Softer Mains With Warrior Response Crosses
Natural gut, multifilament or synthetic gut mains emphasize pocketing and power. Warrior Response crosses can restrain launch while feeling less severe than some firmer polyester options.
The polyester exterior can still notch softer mains. Players prioritizing maximum main-string life may prefer a particularly smooth, low-friction cross.
General Tension Guidance
Warrior Response should be treated as a co-polyester despite its softer core. Copying a high nylon reference tension can make the outer polyester response unnecessarily firm.
Players can begin toward the lower portion of the racket manufacturer’s recommended range, especially when moving from multifilament or synthetic gut. Small changes are easier to evaluate than dramatic reductions.
The fixed 1.30mm gauge, racket pattern and frame stiffness all affect the result. Open patterns may feel livelier, while dense patterns can make the thick stringbed feel more restrained.
The Tennis String Tension Calculator can help organize those variables. Final decisions should be refined with an experienced stringer and consistent notes.
Who Should Use Prince Warrior Response?
Warrior Response is best suited to:
- Intermediate and advanced players seeking a softer co-polyester
- Players who value control but dislike an extremely rigid response
- Flatter hitters who want a stable 1.30mm stringbed
- Moderate topspin players who generate their own racket speed
- Polyester users interested in a hybrid-like internal construction
- Players willing to restring when playability declines
Who Should Avoid Prince Warrior Response?
Warrior Response is less suitable for:
- Beginners who do not need polyester control
- Players seeking maximum free power from compact swings
- Players wanting the thinnest or most aggressively shaped spin string
- Anyone with arm discomfort who should avoid polyester
- Players requiring several verified gauge options
- Players who keep polyester installed until it breaks
Pros and Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Unusual soft-core, firm-outer construction | Commonly available in only 1.30mm |
| Above-average comfort for co-polyester | Less elastic than multifilament or gut |
| Controlled and stable response | Not a maximum-spin shaped string |
| Useful touch for a polyester-based model | Shape descriptions conflict across listings |
| Works in a full bed or hybrid | Tension maintenance is not exceptional by verified claim |
| More accessible than very firm control polys | Some user reports describe early breakage |
Prince Warrior Response Compared With Other Strings
Warrior Response vs Luxilon Element
Luxilon Element also uses a more flexible internal concept to soften polyester performance. Element is a premium Luxilon option with Multi-Mono Technology, while Warrior Response uses a soft polymer core inside a co-extruded polyester exterior.
Warrior Response vs Head Sonic Pro
Head Sonic Pro is a smooth, relatively accessible co-polyester. Sonic Pro offers a more conventional monofilament response, while Warrior Response’s layered core creates a more unusual pocketing profile.
Warrior Response vs Babolat RPM Soft
Babolat RPM Soft is a polyamide monofilament rather than polyester. RPM Soft is more appropriate for players actively avoiding polyester, while Warrior Response retains co-polyester control.
Warrior Response vs Wilson Revolve
Wilson Revolve emphasizes low friction and snapback through its Crosslink Ester and UHMW formulation. Warrior Response emphasizes comfort through its softer internal core.
Final Verdict
Prince Warrior Response is a distinctive co-polyester built around internal material contrast. Its soft polymer core and firmer co-extruded exterior aim to provide the control of polyester with more pocketing and comfort than a conventional firm monofilament.
The evidence supports describing it as a balanced and user-friendly control string, not as a maximum-spin product or universally arm-safe solution. Its single common 1.30mm gauge favors stability and resistance over the quickest possible string movement.
For intermediate and advanced players seeking a softer polyester experience, Warrior Response is a credible full-bed or hybrid option. Its limitations are restricted gauge choice, uncertain shape descriptions and the normal decline in useful co-polyester playability before physical breakage.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Prince Warrior Response made from?
It is a co-polyester string with a softer polymer core enclosed by a firmer co-extruded polyester exterior.
Is Warrior Response a conventional hybrid?
No. Its contrasting materials are layered inside each string. It can still be combined with another string in a normal mains-and-crosses hybrid.
What gauge is Prince Warrior Response?
The consistently documented version is 16 / 1.30mm.
Is Warrior Response a shaped string?
Reliable listings conflict on its exact profile. It should not be marketed as a confirmed triangular string unless current packaging verifies that description.
Is Warrior Response comfortable?
It is comfortable for a co-polyester, but it remains firmer and less elastic than natural gut or a soft multifilament.
Does Warrior Response provide good spin?
It provides useful technique-driven spin, but it is not primarily documented as an aggressively shaped maximum-spin string.
Can Warrior Response be used as a hybrid cross?
Yes. Its relatively forgiving response can restrain softer mains, although the polyester exterior may still cause notching.